Thursday, August 26, 2010

Why Plasma 3D TV is Better Than LCD 3D TV



Plasma 3D TV vs LCD 3D TV wich is better?

With the advent of 3D technology in television, television manufacturers are in a constant race to create the best 3D TV was. New technologies in the world of television like LCD, plasma and LED begin to innovation and specifications subject to immediate improvement - the integration of 3D technology. This leads us to believe that the higher: plasma or LCD TV 3D 3D TV?

The battle between plasma and LCD TV is deliberately stirring three dimensions, thanks to various 3D enthusiasts and critics of television technology. If you only have a regular buyer who are not really aware hardcore facts about TV technology, you will not be able to make all the difference. Posting in the plasma and LCD TVs 3D simply look exactly the same.

However, it is interesting to note that these two TV technologies different ways of processing and presentation of content by 3-D. First, the processing speed of the two is completely different. Although LCD technology has made several attempts to improve his rehabilitation times (or "refresh rates" measured by the unit Hz) from 120Hz to 240 Hz refresh rate of 240 Hz, although the (even while some manufacturers claim a 480 Hz, although it already handling specifications) is as revolutionary LCD technology, the problem with motion blur and jerking from side to side pan is still a problem already evident.

 
As with plasma technology, which is very well known for its stability and superior processing speed, is the extent of what he calls the "technology of ground movements" or "player field under" the processing speed is far in front of the LCD technology, a 600Hz commendable. Now, the question of the 3D display? Absolutely! This means that the 3D LCD TVs deliver not in a position, content in full HD resolution 1080th 3D LCD TV may be a maximum of 800 pixels of resolution through effective handling of their top speed of 240 Hz plasma TV Only 3D offer the speed to deliver an effective resolution of 1080 in both eyes.

Secondly, the effective 3D-LCD-TV 800 pixel resolution for both eyes are already important? Well, not really, because there are still as high-definition, but the question of the motion blur as well as questions of 3D content in a panoramic three-dimensional LCD TV. These questions will never be a 3D plasma television. The perception of the depth of the plasma technology and pixel structure are advanced visualization of 3D representation of the highest quality.

So why the 3D Plasma TV LCD TV better than 3D? Well, overall it was Roger Ebert two thumbs up or 4.4 stars. 3D viewing experience with 3D plasma TV is absolutely superior.

No comments:

Post a Comment